On Tuesday, upon the request of a subset of the parties participating in the rescheduling proceedings, the assigned ALJ cancelled the six weeks of hearings that were scheduled to begin on January 21st. The cancellation order was issued after pro-rescheduling groups claimed that DEA had engaged in ex parte communications with groups opposing the rescheduling. This was the second such request by these groups. Although the ALJ noted the relief sought – removing DEA as the agency advocating for the rescheduling – is not relief the ALJ is empowered to grant and accordingly denied said request, the ALJ cancelled the hearings to enable the moving parties to seek an immediate appeal of that decision with the Administrator of the DEA.
Recent Posts
- Commonwealth Court Confirms Automatic RTKL Stay for Third Party That Did Not Participate Before OOR Due to Deficient Notice
- PA Supreme Court Clarifies How Much Weight Agency Interpretations Carry
- Judge Stays Marijuana Rescheduling Proceeding, April 22nd Order Still Stands
- Top 200 Cannabis Lawyers 7th Ed. 2026-2027 – JUDITH CASSEL IS A TOP 200 LAWYER
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court prepares for upcoming contentious mid-term elections, by quickening pace for court review of election disputes.
717-703-0804