In July, an Ohio Federal District Court granted hemp plaintiffs a preliminary injunction that enjoined Ohio from enforcing Ohio Senate Bill 56, which narrowed the definition of hemp to any substance with a total concentration of no more than 0.3% of any THC compound (federal law defines it as 0.3% of delta-9 THC only) Essentially, Bill 56 made any intoxicating hemp product “marijuana” and so any person desiring to produce or sell these intoxicating hemp products were required to be licensed. The preliminary injunction was granted on a dormant commerce clause theory that Ohio was discriminating against out-of-state companies desiring to do business in Ohio. Thereafter, Ohio appealed this preliminary injunction to the Sixth Circuit and this week filed a reply brief railing against the plaintiff’s arguments.
Recent Posts
- Judge Stays Marijuana Rescheduling Proceeding, April 22nd Order Still Stands
- Top 200 Cannabis Lawyers 7th Ed. 2026-2027 – JUDITH CASSEL IS A TOP 200 LAWYER
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court prepares for upcoming contentious mid-term elections, by quickening pace for court review of election disputes.
- Recent Decision Throws into Question Whether the Federal Courts are a Wise Venue for Cannabis Operators
- Pennsylvania’s Medical Marijuana Bureau’s First Ever Audit Finds MMJ Bureau Processes Inadequate
717-703-0804